Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harbortouch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Harbortouch

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I do not see a good indication of notability for this one-year-old company. Further, this article is an orphan and has just one primary editor &mdash; I believe this page is being used purely for advertisement purposes. Timneu22 (talk) 21:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment - I am the only editor because it was only posted today. Also, I'm not sure what exactly would be needed to differentiate it from an advertising post? I would have to argue that any company entry could subjectively be viewed as both informational and advertising... —Preceding unsigned comment added by N7912 (talk • contribs) 22:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable and as spam. Cquan (after the beep...) 22:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment I'm the one who originally flagged it for spam. I removed my tag because of the clean-up that was immediately done. Possibly too much of a clean-up, as some info has gone that might be of use. One editor? As the creator says, it's a brand-new article. Notability? Maybe. It might be an idea to merge it with its parent United Bank Card until it's established more of a name for itself. The creator seems to me to have edited in good faith and tried to fit the guidelines. (No, I don't have any connection with the company. Yes, I do hit hard at the spammers.) Peridon (talk) 00:08, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 10:45, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, no evidence it passes WP:CORP. --fvw *  02:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.