Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hard Knocks: The Chris Benoit Story (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  keep . east. 718 at 00:46, 11/4/2007 AfDs for this article: 

Hard Knocks: The Chris Benoit Story

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This was previously deleted per AFD, then speedy deleted as a recreation/copyright violation. This is a completely rewritten article, but there is no additional claim of notability or importance beyond any of the previous iterations. Still, I'm not comfortable with a speedy deletion because the original deletion discussion was fairly close. I've no strong opinion on this, though I lean towards deletion or Merge to Chris Benoit on the grounds that there is no demonstrated notability for this individual release. Still, I'd like to see a consensus on this either way. Isotope23 talk 12:39, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. It seems more notable now than it was a year and a half ago. The DVD was used for an episode of RAW after his death, and WWE yanking the disc was something of an issue in the wrestling world.  The article could definitely use more citation for information like that.  At the least, the page could be merged into the Benoit article. 64.236.243.16 16:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


 * As the starter of the article, I feel compelled to vote keep. I'd like to add more to the article, but I am not as big of a wrestling fan as many others on wikipedia.  Surely this disc is as notable as McMahon DVD. --WTStoffs 18:21, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Although we're not supposed to cite WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS that's just a guideline and one of Wikipedia's guidelines is that guidelines can be ignored from time to time. There are other WWE videos with articles, so this one deserves an article too, plus it had additional notability due to its subject matter. Improvements, better citiations, etc. are content issues, not AFD issues. 23skidoo 20:39, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable. Everyking 10:10, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.