Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hardekar Manjappa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:03, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Hardekar Manjappa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources Meatsgains (talk) 02:16, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:33, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:33, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:33, 29 September 2016 (UTC)


 * There is this 222-page book about the subject published by a university press. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 12:19, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: Meets WP:GNG. Given the time-period during which subject lived, majority of sources are supposed to be available in print. Still, in addition to book linked above by IP user, there are quite a few more books available on Gbooks and some English-language sources here. Anup   [Talk]  17:25, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per my comment above. I've just noticed, per a comment at deletion review, that an admin who closes many deletion discussions thinks that opinions that don't have a bolded recommendation with them should be ignored, which is obviously against policy, but I'd better give that bolded opinion in case that admin comes along to evaluate this on the basis of vote counting rather than the content of arguments made. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:16, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep -- meets GNG per sources presented at this AfD. K.e.coffman (talk) 09:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.