Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HarfBuzz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Pango.  So Why  21:21, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

HarfBuzz

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. I think that this is most likely non-notable like most free software. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 14:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- VG &#x260E; 02:47, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Pango. This a common chunk of code (library if you will, but it has no clear API) shared by Pango and the Qt font library. So, you're not going to find any reviews for it, and likely it won't be mentioned in any books either. A merge and redirect is most appropriate, but it's not entirely clear where to redirect this to. I would say redirect to Pango because the Qt font subsystem doesn't have an article. VG &#x260E; 02:57, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * and to Pango per above. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 10:14, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.