Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hari Ng Sablay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:11, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Hari Ng Sablay

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Film with questionable notability-upon looking up the page creators history they seem to have several films like this. Wgolf (talk) 20:46, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 15:06, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 15:06, 23 January 2016 (UTC)


 * alts per WP:BEFORE
 * year:
 * long title:
 * director:
 * screenplay:
 * music:
 * lead:
 * lead:
 * lead:
 * lead:
 * studio:


 * Currently neutral toward a brand new article sent to AFD within minutes of being contributed. And sure, while what was nominated looked poor, it was pretty easy to do some WP:BEFORE and improve its format quite a bit. My thought is that the sheer number of involved Philippines notables allows an inference that it likely may have enough coverage in Filipino or Tagalog sources not crawled or indexed properly by Google News. Under WP:CSB I will await input from editors better able to search that part of the world.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 15:22, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment-part of it was that these articles the creator has been making were unreferenced and it was hard to find info for me on these films! Wgolf (talk) 17:40, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I understand and am being perhaps just a bit luckier with my BEFORE. I've advised him on his talk page and hope he pays attention.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 17:53, 23 January 2016 (UTC)


 * And KEEP now that I found a wealth of coverage for something called a "Box office hit". Time to improve, not to delete.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 04:59, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep for now, it does meet with WP:GNG as a criteria with WP:NFILM. ApprenticeFan  work 13:50, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.