Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harihar clan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  20:23, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Harihar clan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

In its current form, the article is a mish-mash of the articles Harihar and Mian Tansen with a couple of extra sentences and an image that's in fact a map of a French department (Aisne). There are no references and I'm unable to find coverage of this topic in reliable sources. In particular, there's no sign of the supposed founder of the clan Harihar Singh (Harihar Singh is in fact a modern political figure). Pichpich (talk) 14:08, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: Appears to be a mish-mash of hoax and wellness stuff, complete with a kingdom of a musician and footnotes that don't lead anywhere. Whatever it started out as, the article that's there now is not only not notable, but not verifiable. Hithladaeus (talk) 18:20, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  16:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  14:58, 2 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. I agree that this might be a hoax as I can't seem to verify any of the information. I have tagged the page with hoax. Not blatant enough to me to be speedied as a hoax article but still worth questioning the overall truthfulness of the article. Wiki you now, Wiki you later! (talk) 01:13, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. If it's a hoax, delete it for that reason. If it's not it would need a complete rewrite so delete per WP:TNT. --Michig (talk) 13:27, 4 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.