Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harikela


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keep Countries are definitely notable. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:01, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Harikela

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Only wiki referenced Janc6 (talk) 21:41, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note The nomination was done on the page but not listed, just listed it now. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 23:51, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep - I've never seen a country up for AfD before. Just a 5 second book search showed, according to the Encyclopaedia of Bangladesh  and The Indian historical quarterly, this was a kingdom in the southeastern Bengal region during the 700s-800s with a lineage of rulers. .  According to other sources (from what I can read of them) it also was an prominent Buddhist learning center..  The nom's reasoning for deleting this article, "only wiki referenced" is reason to add more references, not deleting the article.  Another violation of WP:BEFORE example. --Oakshade (talk) 23:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. I've got to go this route because of the other nominations around the same time: Ladahachandra and Govindachandra. The nominator's only contributions have been to nominate AfDs within this series of articles on the Candra dynasty and edit the same articles. As far as notability goes, this was a  country , so it pretty much has a right to exist on Wikipedia. Verifiable on GBooks. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 23:51, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:59, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.