Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haris Tarin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. I'm going to stub the article back to the version created, which was referenced and asserted (if weakly) notability. Note that I'm doing that as an editor and not as part of the close. Mackensen (talk) 04:05, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Haris Tarin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ANYBIO, no claims to notability other than having a job and being a graduate student. Needs references WP:TOOSOON re articles he has published. MJH (talk) 23:00, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi people. I was the user who started this article as a stub. I see that another user has further added and added information which is not further referenced. As for me, this old version was short, but at least referenced enough. I propose going back to it. Regards, --Fabio Descalzi, aka Fadesga (talk) 01:34, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 02:24, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep the subject is apparently notable. Nevertheless, the article needs work. Mr T  (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 11:25, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * President Obama called him to thank him for his work. The Washington Post also talked about his speech at a Washington panel on how the next U.S. president can combat violent Islamic extremism. This huffington post bio is useful also. The question I think is can we write a credible article about this man with citations of reliable sources? I think we can. Let's not stretch it further. Cheers, Mr T  (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 20:12, 21 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 06:18, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Weak Keep Per Mrt3366's evidence, it seems if one were to fix up the article using those sources, the article could establish notability. However, I am not 100% sure about this, and I think we could find this out best if we did it. Unless I decide to go to sleep instead or get sidetracked, I will try this approach out for myself. Greengreengreen red  07:04, 15 December 2012 (UTC) Analysis of those sources shows a lack of notability for this article. Therefore, my vote is Delete.  Greengreengreen  red  07:16, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Has been the subject of some significant coverage, e.g. Washington Post, Daily News of Los Angeles. --Michig (talk) 09:16, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 21:12, 22 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable. Coverage is minor with few accomplishments to warrant an entry in an encyclopedia. "Rising ... leader" suggests he might become interesting. Jason from nyc (talk) 15:12, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.