Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harivansh Chaturvedi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 19:23, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Harivansh Chaturvedi
Non notable. Article does not assert the reason as to why this person is notable, and other than his post, what accomplishments make him worthy of an encyclopedia article. --Ragib 21:35, 24 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete: NN (should have been speedied under A7). --Ragib 21:35, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Obviously not a speedy and seems quite notable to me.   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  22:39, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep primarily due to authorship of a book . Other credentials don't seem to add up to much. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  22:43, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Changed to Delete after further research. While the book in question does seem to technically exist, it has no Amazon sales rank and the title scores just 13 google hits.  Even most self-published and vanity-press books do better than that, and I'm uncomfortable with what precedent might be set by keeping an article based on something that tenuous and obscure. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:45, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nope, NN. - the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E)  22:54, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete millions of people in this world have written books. --Khoikhoi 01:22, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * i know H chaturvedi, he USED TO to write books & WAS involved in CPIM(communist party in india).

Anmol.2k4 17:52, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep can i vote in this ??, i have started this article, this guy "H. Chaturvedi" is a very well known person in higher education in india and is head at many educational organisation, if i can vote then my vote will be to keep.11,400 entries are returned by google, that is strong.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.