Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harlan J. Brothers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 05:43, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Harlan J. Brothers
Does not meet the WP:PROFTEST criteria. The author (Hjb) is clearly the subject himself. Is this a vanity page? Ogdred 02:19, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep He seems notable enough to me. Last I checked WP:VAIN and WP:AUTO were not reasons to delete verifiable bios on notable people.  Although, I would cut out some of it. kotepho 02:36, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Has a few patents. Notable enough for me L e idiot 03:11, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kotepho, the mathematical work seems notable enough. --Lockley 03:19, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep As much as I wish people would stop submitting their autobiographies, this does seem to be a notable-enough person and a fairly well-written article. AmiDaniel (Talk) 04:03, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable enough for me. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag of Texas.svg|30px]] 04:07, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep may be vanity, but still notable.--MONGO 04:40, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Verifiably satisfies WP:BIO.   dbtfz talk 06:45, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable in my opinion and I would like a cleanup to be done so that it would not read like a vanity article. --Ter e nce Ong 11:55, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep; number theory is one of the few areas in mathematics where nonprofessionals regularly produce notable work. Monicasdude 14:28, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems ok.  The article could use some cleanup though.  --C S (Talk) 10:55, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:KIT, to say the least. &mdash; 0918 BRIAN &bull; 2006-03-31 01:57


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.