Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harleys XXX TV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Harleys XXX TV

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable sources available per Google News. Google searches result in YouTube channels and other video sites - these are not reliable sources. This article has no references. Notability is not inherited per WP:INHERITORG. Fails GNG, and WP:ORG. I am unable to verify this has any connection to Time Warner. This show has no claim to notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steve Quinn (talk • contribs) 18:01, 8 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:40, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:40, 8 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - No RS coverage about this public access TV program. Fieari (talk) 00:32, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:09, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:10, 9 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:V, never mind WP:GNG, with no reliable source coverage at all. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Great show, Something you could watch around the dinner table with your family at Christmas!, Anyway back on topic fails GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 21:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Good one! (chuckling) --Steve Quinn (talk) 23:16, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking RS coverage with no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: It fails WP:V because of no reliable sources coverage. Subject may also be notable per WP:TVSERIES. Ayub 407 talk 17:58, 15 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.