Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harmful Tax Competition: An Emerging Global Issue


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 16:56, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Harmful Tax Competition: An Emerging Global Issue

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Ideally merged with tax competition. The article does not show that the report is particularly notable to warrant an article. If notability for the report may be demonstrated, then the article can be kept. — Nearly Headless Nick   {c}  01:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a soapbox.Trillfendi (talk) 02:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. -- PATH SLOPU (Talk) 02:34, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. -- PATH SLOPU (Talk) 02:34, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge with tax competition per nom Girth Summit  (blether)  02:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment There are some sources here-- PATH SLOPU (Talk) 02:46, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:10, 16 January 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nightfury 11:31, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Three of the first four hits from the Google Scholar search linked by Path slopu above (I didn't need to look any further) are academic papers specifically about this report, rather than the general topic of tax competition:, , , with the final one being a retrospective paper written after ten years, so long-term impact is demonstrated. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:06, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - since the scholar search shows this passes the ridiculously low bar of WP:NBOOK (which creates an open avenue for POV articles).Icewhiz (talk) 08:24, 30 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.