Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harmon Nelson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete with redirect, recognising that the discussion indicates merge to Bette Davis, but as highlighted by Metropolitan90 the content is a copy of IMDB hence a copyright violation Gnangarra 04:28, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Harmon Nelson

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable former husband of Bette Davis. After contacting one of the major authors of the article, I proposed merging the two articles, but the response over the two weeks or so since the proposal has been negative. Given the unreferenced and largely unverifiable nature of the Nelson article, I'm inclined to agree with the commenters when they say that an infobox mention is more than enough. jonny-mt(t)(c) I'm on editor review! 08:40, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * For whatever reason, when I nominated this article using Twinkle some wires got crossed and it never got listed or tagged. As such, I'm listing it properly on the deletion log now.  I apologize for the confusion. --jonny-mt(t)(c) I'm on editor review! 03:09, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect to Bette Davis. Most of the content here was either copied from Nelson's entry on the copyrighted Internet Movie Database or from Wikipedia's own article on Bette Davis, including even the footnote number from the Davis article. (That would explain why this article with no actual citations has a note numbered "29".) --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:09, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge salvageable importance into Bette Davis. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 04:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge Notable only in relation to her. Mbisanz (talk) 02:22, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.