Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HarmonySEQ (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 23:45, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

HarmonySEQ
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Deleted in previous AfD, Fails WP:N. The official website for the software is a WordPress blog. Joe Chill (talk) 17:01, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 17:25, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

         --Marqin (talk) 19:20, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete – unless secondary sources that establish notability can be found. Dicklyon (talk) 18:11, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: Does not meet notability requirements listed in WP:NSOFT. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 19:18, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't delete... The official website is not blog(btw. many big companies have blogs). It's just made on WordPress. Yes, you can make a website with WordPress - it's fast & free(if you don't like free/open source - don't use Wikipedia). --Marqin (talk) 22:24, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I like open source software myself even non-notable software. I use them for my personal video editing needs. Me liking certain software though doesn't make them notable for Wikipedia. The comment about it being the business's website still doesn't show any notability. Joe Chill (talk) 22:36, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Btw. author of hseq said me some days ago that one of musicans(who's using it) is writing some articles about his equipment&software for newspaper, it will be notable then? --Marqin (talk) 22:53, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:N, no sources that meet WP:RS. Non-notable software. X X X antiuser eh? 22:32, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * You are saying that are no secondary sources - how about f.e. this article(listed in sources for ling time...)? --Marqin (talk) 22:56, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, some more sources:


 * Delete - Those mentions are very minor, and I didn't see any other notable sources on Google and Yahoo. SwisterTwister  talk  22:05, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Maybe you are not searching good? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marqin (talk • contribs) 22:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.