Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harmonyum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 18:18, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Harmonyum

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Mystical fluff with no sources other than corporate web page and self-published books. I found lots of blog sources but could not find anything reputable. Looie496 (talk) 05:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello, I am the author of this article and I have had a very hard time citing it due to the fact that as you say, all of the books are self-published. I have tried writing the article in four different creative ways to make it not sound like an advertisement or like "mystical fluff" as the previous critique states. I have a genuine desire to place this subject on Wikipedia in accordance with the appropriate standards and criteria as it truly is a healing system that exists and that we offer at Universal Force Healing Center. Studies are currently being done but we just don't have medical statements right now. If you have any advice for me on how to better write this or cite this please let me know as I think is definitely noteworthy as it is healing people from various diseases (cancer, tumors, heart problems, bi-polar issues etc). I tried to write the article in such a way so that people knew it hadn't been proved but that it does exist, and I think that is fair and honest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.105.80.25 (talk) 19:11, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:41, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - per WP:N - no independent secondary sources can be found. (The only independent source in the article is Blavatsky, who of course doesn't refer to Harmonyum, having died some considerable period before it was conceived.)  To the author of the article, I appreciate that your only sources are self-published - what you'd need in order to have an article is to have your self-published works discussed by other people in newspapers, magazines, or books.  That would be the proof we need that someone other than you cares about your books and your ideas.  Feel free to recreate if that ever occurs. - DustFormsWords (talk) 07:56, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - no reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:21, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.