Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold Gardner (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 14:20, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Harold Gardner
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject's sole claim to fame is that they served in the military for one day, because the war ended right afterwards. Trivial press coverage on this basis. Otherwise utterly mundane life. Previous AfD in 2005 was kept based on non-policy arguments around his being one of the last surviving WWI vets, of which there are now none at all. BD2412 T 22:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  BD2412  T 22:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * - courtesy pinging participants from the 2005 discussion. BD2412  T 22:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering, New York,  and Pennsylvania.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: The "Doughboy for a Day" article is fine, but I don't find other sources in books or news about this person. Hasn't really done anything else other than being in the army for a day. Likely not enough to build an article with. Oaktree b (talk) 01:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete It's unclear what the basis for notability is supposed to be. Reywas92Talk 14:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete it sounds like Gardner may not have even been formally inducted into the Army, and possibly if he was it was after the armistice was signed (aka the war had ended), so even the “last veteran claim is dubious. Best, GPL93 (talk) 03:00, 18 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.