Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold Hafner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:07, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Harold Hafner
This person doesn't seem particularly notable to me. He produces a mere 201 google hits. and none of the first ones suggest anything particularly notable. There are no google news hits.--best, kevin [kzollman][talk] 02:34, 8 December 2005 (UTC) ''Note: relisting 15/12/05 ... which is apparently still 14/12/05 for AfD. Never let it be said AfD is backwards! fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 15:41, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete (speedy} There is no claim of notability, just "had some successes". NN - NN - NN Chris the speller 04:12, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy per above. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:15, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn--MONGO 02:03, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsourced, POV (possibly self-promotion), not linked from anywhere, no assertion of notability. &mdash; F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( TALK )  15:28, Dec. 14, 2005
 * I for one find the above arguments far from convincing. The search link provided by User:Kzollman provided over 500 hits when I looked at it, not "a mere 201".  The search results indicate to me that he's reasonably notable in the modelling talent agency world.  He may not be notable enough for his own article, but I think we'll need more than the above discussion before deciding to delete. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 15:41, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I just checked the search string given in the nomination, and came up with 555 hits 90 of which were unique. Saberwyn - 21:00, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable enough. And User:MarkGallagher lives too far east, it's still Wednesday over here. &mdash; J I P | Talk 16:05, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.