Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold W. Moll


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 22:14, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Harold W. Moll

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't see anything notable to rate a WP article. Fails WP:SOLDIER. Reads like the bio of many war vets - not notable IMO Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. A.Minkowiski_Lets t@lk 12:39, 17 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. This soldier has some excellence work but unfortunately no independent source found, and does't have received much military awards, highest award for valour etc. Fails as per WP:MILPEOPLE.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 17 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Does not meet WP:GNG. EricSerge (talk) 13:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, honourable but dull military career. Note that article very probably created by a relative and that article is (apart from find a grave) unsourced, so very possibly original research.TheLongTone (talk) 14:20, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delere almost unsourced, doesn't meet WP:GNG. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 14:33, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant decorations and too junior to meet notability requirements without good reason, which there doesn't appear to be. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:43, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.