Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harper and the Moths


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While this is borderline, there was no support for a delete beyond the nominator and the commenters either voted keep or noted the addition of sources. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:18, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Harper and the Moths

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BAND and WP:GNG. Has some coverage, but not sufficient. Smartyllama (talk) 18:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:35, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:35, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:43, 29 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: I've added much more references that should help with the decision. Kishmael 21:23, 03 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. The article is not great; I've tagged it as a stub due to the lack of content.  However, the band has certainly received some coverage in reliable sources.  FalconK (talk) 04:51, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:38, 7 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - This article is a little disorganized and needs some expansion to properly identify with the group, but that does not mean the subject does not have some significant coverage.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 07:00, 7 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.