Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harpy (Dungeons & Dragons)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:28, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Harpy (Dungeons & Dragons)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Kept as part of a bulk nomination over a decade ago. Current reception doesn't even belong in the article. Otherwise no sources attempting to establish notability. TTN (talk) 18:02, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:02, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:02, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:02, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete fails GNG Chetsford (talk) 18:20, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete It's completely silly to have pages for every single creature here, I think that's the kind of stuff suitable for a fansite. Ccccchaton000 (talk) 18:22, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to harpy as it is the same critter. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:33, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - The coverage presented in the article from non-game books is trivial, and in one case, not from a reliable source. They say nothing but one sentence giving the common sense fact that D&D based their harpies from the mythological monster.  This is insufficient coverage to establish any kind of notability.  I would also be opposed to merging this to the main harpy article as proposed, as this iteration is not notable enough to warrant a mention there.  Rorshacma (talk) 22:53, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Usual variety DnD fancruft. Nothing here deserves merging anywhere.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 14:28, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable fancruft, fails GNG.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:26, 6 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.