Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harrah's Ak-Chin Casino


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 20:37, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Harrah's Ak-Chin Casino

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This seems somewhat locally notable and some sources say this has "a big impact" locally and generates a lot of revenue (see this, this and this) from my searches here, here, here, here and here. Therefore, I nominated this to get comments and consensus. It has existed since 2006 but, unfortunately, has swinged back and forth between promotional material, which if the article is kept, will need to be taken of (some precautionary measures may be good for future promotional additions). SwisterTwister  talk  05:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as the nominee has not even tried to make an argument for deletion. But just for fun, I did a NewsBank search for "harrah's and ak-chin", which returned 1,491 results spanning the last 23 years. Here are some highlights from the first 50 results, which I think will demonstrate that GNG is satisfied:       Toohool (talk) 23:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:05, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:05, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:38, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a substantial operation—I note that another $100 million expansion has just been announced —and as a general proposition these kinds of casinos tend to get articles, and there are plenty of sources as  says.   --Arxiloxos (talk) 03:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: There are tons of sources for the article, and per Toohool above, it seems like the nominator isn't even calling for its deletion. Just because an article is promotion-y is not a good enough reason for an article to be deleted if it is notable enough to exist. Nomader (talk) 03:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - I concur with what's stated above. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:44, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.