Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harriman House


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Unambiguous copyright violation. Yunshui 雲 水 14:56, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Harriman House

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH/WP:GNG. Kleuske (talk) 13:24, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 13:24, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 13:24, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Delete There is no in-depth coverage about this company that I could find. The sources I was able to find are mostly press releases from Harriman or an explanation of their company from the company. I was about to mark as speedy deletion corporation notability because as it stands there is not anything in the actual article that indicates it is notable.-- VViking Talk Edits 13:58, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Delete Agree 100% with ^^ MaskedSinger (talk) 14:16, 8 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.