Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harris J


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. SoWhy 11:28, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Harris J

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:MUSICBIO Cabayi (talk) 18:00, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 18:00, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep I found   by searching for the ambiguous term, "Harris J" and then appending "Awakening Records". Those are from news alone, although the general web search was less than fruitful. Would like to see Cabayi improve the article with content gleaned from those two entries. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Changing the Google news search to "J Harris, music," produces dedicated articles from NPR, Chron.com, and a reliable Pakistani newspaper site, Express Tribune, plus a video in St. Louis main newspaper website, plus a mention in an Al Jazeera article. Saw nothing on record sales, or much on deals. The originator of the article needs to get to work. This could be a keep. Tapered (talk) 06:55, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per the coverage turned up with previous votes. My translation software for the CNN Indonesia site reveals the piece to be independent and non-trivial. While the NPR one is an interview, being on All Things Considered is significant. The Express Tribune piece is a bit weak, but it is coverage in a notable source nonetheless, and added to the other two makes it enough to convince me the subject is notable. But—yes—the article needs lots of work. ShelbyMarion (talk) 13:13, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 04:47, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, just about enough from looking at the refs. Szzuk (talk) 08:53, 3 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.