Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harrison Freud

Nonsense. Rick'''K 06:22, Jul 15, 2004 (UTC)


 * Not significant. Delete. Average Earthman 11:19, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete: Not significant.  The only significant noun in the article has an entry already. Geogre 00:38, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. Exploding Boy 01:18, Jul 16, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. If this information is significant, it goes in The Models anyway.  --Ardonik 08:20, Jul 16, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Either straight up vanity, or possibly a joke on the name of a certain actor. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 03:29, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clean up. --[[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 18:14, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Is this "Who's Who"? No, it isn't. It's the Wikipedia. We should delete 'Harrison Freud', as he appears to be no more than a pun on the name of the famous movie actor Harrison Birtwistle, possibly confused with the famous psychoanalyst Lucian Freud. -- Brequinda 09:09, Jul 21, 2004 (BST)
 * Delete: not significant. Wile E. Heresiarch 22:40, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * Keep, but complete. One of the comments mention that the article "Links to the company." I did not see any such link. Of the three external links, two link to industry alliances (http://www.homeplug.com/ and http://www.smarthomeforum.com/start/homeplug.asp?ID=13) and one to a PC World article on HomePlug. Surely, there is nothing wrong with linking to industry alliances. For example the Wifi article there is a link to http://wi-fi.org/. That being said, the HomePlug article is pretty much content free, so if it gets deleted not much is lost. - anon