Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harrison Houde


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 20:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Harrison Houde

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article that was previously BLP-prodded for lacking any sources whatsoever. Three references have since been added, but two are to his own YouTube videos and the last is to his IMDb profile — meaning there still aren't any reliable sources, but only primary and user-generated ones. As always, I'm willing to withdraw this nomination if somebody can actually WP:HEY it up to a keepable standard with real references to support a real claim of notability that's more than just "makes YouTube videos and has had minor supporting roles in film and television" — but it's clearly a delete in its current form. Bearcat (talk) 16:54, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 5 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails notability test. Atrian (talk) 18:33, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * do no delete Do not delete this page. If you follow any of the links you will notice many are his PERSONALLY owned pages and there are bundles of information to pull from those. Everything follows up fine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.46.19.175 (talk) 20:30, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:SPS and WP:BLPPRIMARY. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:50, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:50, 13 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails notability. References are not reliable/credible and/or COI.  Caffeyw (talk) 07:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.