Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harrison Street Real Estate (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 21:49, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Harrison Street Real Estate
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is the second AfD proposed for this page, the last AfD (done on 16 January 2019) had no consensus and no prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation: WP:Articles for deletion/Harrison Street Real Estate. Since that time little has changed about the article, the main change has been removal of some fluff and puffery. There have been no new inclusions of sources. See diff. Of some parallel relevancy, an AfD has been opened (by me) yesterday on one of the co-founders of this organization: WP:Articles for deletion/Christopher N. Merrill

Edit: A note regarding Ccm1042 the creator of the article, whom very likely is an WP:SPA, which is readily evident in their contribution history, and has a history of Puffing the article, though later recanting that and aiming for more neutrality. --Tautomers (T C) 23:32, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

This article does not quite pass WP:GNG and also seems to fail WP:ORG/WP:CORP. While the organization does appear in the news several times regarding its activities, these alone do not count as WP:SIGCOV. Further, I was not able to find any major independent news articles profiling the company to notify its significance. In the 2.5 years since it's first AfD little if anything substantive has changed regarding its notability. In the first AfD there was a single vote to keep and a discussion regarding the size of the investment firm (in the billions) as grounds to keep it. However, I didn't see anything referring to that dividing line in WP:ORG and thus feel it's worth a re-analysis at least. If there is a documented litmus test for it please share below and take it into account when voting and discussing.

Thanks! -- Tautomers (T C) 20:20, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:04, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:04, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:04, 29 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH per review of available sources. Sources are in passing or WP:SPIP; most are rewarmed press releases. --K.e.coffman (talk) 17:36, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. It appears to be some sort of run of the mill REIT. Bearian (talk) 00:27, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete definitely fails WP:CORP for lack of significant coverage, or any deep coverage. Billions sounds impressive, but doesn't grant notability. ---Bejnar (talk) 21:20, 8 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.