Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Ahlin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as this frankly seems to only be going one path and it's been open since Saturday; also the fact this is from the earlier part of the past century, chances are this will need attention from archives (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  04:51, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Harry Ahlin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable actor; fails WP:NACTOR Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 06:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: Notable. There is an article about Ahlin in Nationalencyklopedin. --Hegvald (talk) 08:56, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:BASIC. This individual has more than sixty film credits in the Swedish film industry across five decades.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 09:07, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as per above seems notable to me. Or can the nominator give a better explanation for his proposal. Sander.v.Ginkel (Talk) 09:36, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets notability requirements. Article just needs some more work. VanEman (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 22:34, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 22:34, 2 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - article quality is irrelevant. This actor is notable per WP:GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.