Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Bloomfield


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 22:54, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Harry Bloomfield

 * – ( View AfD View log )

autobiography tagged since December 2010 for having no references  Teapot  george Talk  18:45, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. From this edit, it is clear this is an autobiographical piece; the article has major problems with WP:V, WP:NPOV and WP:OWN. Notability is most likely not met but because the article in its current form is so flawed it should be deleted regardless (and recreated only if notability can be demonstrated). RichardOSmith (talk) 20:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete this unreferenced BLP unless someone can demonstrate notability with reliable sources and strip away all the extraneous CV type material.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  22:50, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 7 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - This is a resume and autobiography. There's a bit of coverage about him running against Trudeau.  That's really a sacrificial lamb candidacy.  See, and .  He had a conviction for securities fraud overturned on appeal , but there's little coverage of that either.  -- Whpq (talk) 16:25, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete no 3rd party mentions when searched forCurb Chain (talk) 15:45, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.