Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Foundalis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 20:13, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Harry Foundalis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Page was previously PROD deleted but one of the authors objected (on twitter) so I thought it best to restore and have a proper AfD discussion. There appears to be nothing overly wrong with the article although it is quite short and needs to be checked for potential POV issues (someone tagged it thusly). But I leave it to others to discuss the deletion question. Jimbo Wales (talk) 10:13, 12 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. I PRODded this article in June 2011. Minimal citability (per GoogleScholar, WebOfScience and Scopus), and nothing else appears to indicate passing WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 10:43, 12 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Nsk92 (talk) 10:46, 12 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete As Jimbo says, nothing overly wrong with this and I don't see any overt POV problems. But like Nsk92, I don't see anything that would constitute a pass of WP:ACADEMIC or WP:GNG. Too early. --Randykitty (talk) 10:53, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to have a GS h-index of 2. Not remotely enough for a pass of WP:Prof. Nothing else. Far too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:56, 12 April 2014 (UTC).
 * Delete per nomination, and per Xxanthippe. Fails WP:ACADEMIC, although it is nice that his work is included in the Artificial Intelligence and Data Mining courses at Dartmouth College and University of Sussex, that does not equate to making a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions. --Bejnar (talk) 16:45, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 13 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Does not seem to pass notability requirements under WP:PROF or WP:BIO.--Eric Yurken (talk) 14:17, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Too low citations to pass WP:PROF and no evidence of passing other WP:PROF criteria. The claim in the article that "his work has been mentioned" in other scholarly publications is a much lower bar than WP:PROF and is insufficient for notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:02, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.