Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Lazarenko


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Harry Lazarenko

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. While consensus formerly allowed city councillors in Winnipeg to be considered notable per WP:NPOL #3, that consensus has now been deprecated as no longer applicable. There's no substantive evidence here that he's more notable than the norm for a city councillor, however; there are just two pieces of reliable source coverage being cited, and they're (a) both in local media outlets where coverage of municipal councillors is routinely expected, and (b) about him having an aneurysm and announcing his retirement from council rather than substantive coverage of anything political he did on the council. Bearcat (talk) 07:25, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 07:30, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 07:30, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:20, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per new consensus at related AfDs. The article, taken individually, is not convincing and additional sources to build a non-WP:PSEUDO BLP are unlikely to manifest themselves. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:35, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete members of the Winnipeg City Council are not default notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:48, 7 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.