Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Lyme


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Harry Lyme

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:N Non-notable fictional character

WP:BOP No sources at all, let alone any establishing notability

WP:O Orphan article Yamara ✉  23:11, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed. I did my own search...16 google news archive hits, but 10 of them actually reference the character by the same name in "The Third Man".  Similar results for google scholar.  None of the sources cover the character in detail or do anything to even come close to establishing notability.  Cazort (talk) 23:57, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete third man character is more deserving of article, though he too is probably not a notable character.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:31, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable, although WP:O is irrelevant to a deletion discussion. Rlendog (talk) 15:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —PC78 (talk) 11:44, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.