Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Potter's Invisibility Cloak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Merge to Deathly Hallows (objects). PeaceNT 11:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Harry Potter's Invisibility Cloak
This is getting too crufty, I doubt that it's so notable that it deserves it's own article, merge somewhere like to Magic in Harry Potter or even Delete Jaranda wat's sup 23:45, 27 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep, Harry Potter's cloak plays a very important part in the series, this is an article about HIS cloak. So I think it does deserve its own! As I created it!  **Ko2007**   23:50, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Creating the article isn't a reason to keep it, and I read all the books it's not that important. Jaranda wat's sup 23:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment, I never said creating it is a reason I just stated I was the creator, and btw its a Deathly Hallow so yes I think its important, and well I guess well see what others think.   **Ko2007**   23:55, (UTC) 27 August 2007
 * Comment. Notability is not inherited. Dbromage  [Talk]  01:21, 28 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to Harry Potter per lack of secondary sources to establish notability. Dbromage  [Talk]  01:21, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge As HP's cloak is revealed in book 7 as one of the Hallows, merge into Deathly Hallows (objects). Merge stuff about other magical cloaks into Magic in Harry Potter. Wl219 01:45, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per above to HP, even though it looks to be a key element in the series, a lack of sources forces me to go for the merge.--JForget 02:04, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into Deathly Hallows (objects)--Supernerd 10 16:54, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge wherever. Even if in the universe of HP it were the single most important item, unless someone not related to JK Rowling or her publishers writes about it, it fails to be notable. --Goochelaar 18:24, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Invisibility Cloaks play an important part in the Harry Potter series. The article is very bad and needs cleanup, but should be kept and not merged
 * Comment This article is/is supposed to be about Harry's Invisibility cloak, not Invisibility cloaks in general. - Lemonflash (do something)  23:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge into Deathly Hallows (objects) because the cloak is well covered in that article anyway, and we don't really need another article with it. (But it definitly should be mentioned, it's very important). Shmooshkums 21:33, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into Deathly Hallows (objects). The cloak isn't really that important, besides Harry using it alot, and it being a Deathly Hallow. - Lemonflash (do something)  23:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into Deathly Hallows (objects). Happy-melon 16:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment All editors arguing "Keep it's important" should note the important distinction between "important" and "notable" at WP:FICT. Happy-melon 16:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. It does not seem to be notable enough for Wikipedia, and it is almost entirely redundant with the "Cloak of Invisibility" section of Deathly Hallows (objects). (I would agree with those suggesting the merge, but it's really a matter of deleting a duplicate.) -Phi*n!x 19:50, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep for links OR Merge into Deathly Hallows (objects), DISAGREE of deletion It is one of the Deathly Hallows. And it is a important role, so it is not suitable for delete. However, I have no idea of keep or merge. Raymond Giggs 08:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.