Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Plot Summary)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy deleted by User:Alkivar. --Deskana (talk) 05:19, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Plot Summary)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wiki does not have plot summary pages alone LizzieHarrison 20:31, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, the main article on the book should cover this already. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 20:38, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to main article for TenPoundHammer's reason. Nyttend
 * Merge to main article as per nomination. Books don't get separate plot summary pages, even books as popular as this one.  --Wingsandsword 20:41, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:NOT, even though it was a good book it still doesn't need it own page for a plot. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 21:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. As plot summary.  I don't think a redirect would be suitable in this case per R3, nobody would search that exact string.  Useight 22:07, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge - no reason for this to exist as a seperate article. Elmo 22:54, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and don't merge. The plot summary on Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is already unencyclopedic and too detailed; this plot summary doesn't add anything new, and can simply be deleted.  Switcher cat  talkcont 02:08, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Just delete per Switchercat. Already in the article this would be merged with. Flyguy649 talk contribs 03:01, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and don't merge. we don't need any more detail than exists in the article presently. Calliopejen1 04:42, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Clearcut violation of WP:NOT Corpx 05:01, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and don't merge. WP:NOT, the main article already has far too much plot summary, and if Les Mis doesn't need this treatment, HP7 certainly doesn't. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 05:02, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Fails WP:NOT. All decent content is already in the main article Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 05:03, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * That's not a valid speedy deletion reason, but it's a valid deletion reason. --Deskana (talk) 05:12, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.