Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Potter and the Secret Chamberpot of Azerbaijan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Parodies of Harry Potter. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:11, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Harry Potter and the Secret Chamberpot of Azerbaijan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not finding any reviews for this. There is no reception in the article and efforts to find anything outside of torrent sites seem futile.  « ₣M₣ »  20:46, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep & Comment - I made the article, I made it as I believed it to be notable as a parody of Harry Potter. I would also like to point out the existence of the Spider-Plant Man article, also a Comic Relief sketch which is similar to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evilgidgit (talk • contribs)
 * Keep - there are plenty of parodies of Harry Potter around. Should be listed on Parodies of Harry Potter ... Whiteguru (talk) 10:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: So far the keep arguments sound like "other stuff exists." The problem with this article (and Spider-Plant Man and so many others like them) is that they are unreferenced.  Wikipedia is not for plot-only descriptions of fictional works (see WP:PLOT).  If this sketch is notable, the author is obligated to find commentary in reliable sources.  The article needs to be supported by more than links to fan sites. -MrFizyx (talk) 14:46, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Per MrFizyx; lack of sources and it's virtually all plot. Sergecross73   msg me   17:23, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Per the keep comment, yes, it could go to Parodies of Harry Potter, but doesn't need a separate article.  CycloneGU (talk) 00:34, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Parodies of Harry Potter where this parody is already discussed. If reliable sources turn up later, the article can be re-created. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:43, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete' - Independent notability not established, appears to be a one time performance. As pointed out above the fact that there are similar articles is not a reason to include this one as much as to take a look at the others for notability as well. Sea photo Talk  01:49, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect any noteworthy, referenced content (not much here at present) to Parodies of Harry Potter. Bob talk 10:15, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, is there any noteworthy, referenced content at present? Where is the evidence to suggest there would be later? -MrFizyx (talk) 03:50, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * No, there isn't much, is there? The implication was just to redirect it, really. Bob talk 23:34, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.