Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Riley

Harry Riley was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

As immediately preceding item, which is related: &#8212; not notable, right? &#8212; Bill 23:01, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find anything on him at all. Probably a school master.  If he was more than that -- a bishop, a sectarian, a reformer, an artistocrat -- I can't find it using my handy paper references, and I know better than to wade through the 15,000 or so contemporary Harry Rileys who'd show up on Google. Geogre 03:55, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * A Victorian who founded a school. There were a lot of Victorians who founded schools, why is this one notable? Average Earthman 10:55, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * OK, I completely agree with all of you. I am pretty sure that the articles I have previously created/edited are relevant. It was only after coming across quite a few, in my opinion, short and irrelvant articles about villages and so on, that I wrote Strathallan School, Harry Riley and Bruce K Thompson. Most likely the school article, and almost certainly the other two, should be deleted. Mat334 17:19, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. --Improv 01:13, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. --209.94.128.82 18:30, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.