Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Zolnierczyk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:10, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Harry Zolnierczyk

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Rookie minor league hockey player who doesn't meet notability requirements per WP:NHOCKEY Johnblue52 (talk) 21:57, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Yes, he quite obviously does not meet the requirements. That is not to stay he won't (very likely) meet them some day... Bobnorwal (talk) 22:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - Being the Ivy League Player of the Year doesn't pass requirement 4 (Achieved preeminent honours... in a major collegiate hockey league)? --Izzygood (talk) 01:51, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Ivy League Player of the Year would appear to pass WP:NHOCKEY criterion 4. Rlendog (talk) 22:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The Ivy League doesn't really exist for ice hockey. The six members that do compete in hockey do it in the ECAC.  Patken4 (talk) 20:50, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 10 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete NCAA player of the year maybe, but just a conference? I wouldn't call that a pass on NHOCKEY. Either way, given nothing else can really be said about him except for his conviction due to a lack of RS coverage, I am strongly inclined to support deletion per WP:BLP. Resolute 17:26, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with Resolute, if it were player of the year for the NCAA itself. But not an individual conference. -DJSasso (talk) 23:21, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.