Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harssh A Poddar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy Delete. G7 per author request. Worked on at Draft:Harssh A Poddar (non-admin closure)  Jupitus Smart  18:41, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Harssh A Poddar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not meet general notability requirements. Meatsgains (talk) 01:46, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:40, 29 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. Looks notable to me.  Just sayin'.  – Athaenara  ✉  18:24, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm working on citation formats and hope it can be raised to The Heymann Standard. – Athaenara  ✉  19:43, 29 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. It's notable and I am working for making improvements in this article. - Workmk ✉   —Preceding undated comment added 20:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment I see that the article has been deleted as CSD G7 but the discussion at User_talk:Athaenara shows that Workmk has already removed the G7 tag. But the article has been deleted, so most likely the CSD tag was not removed. Athaenara and  Workmk. What is happening here ? would you guys clear up your intentions ? you should let the AfD run its course, if you have plans to recreate this again. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  09:57, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
 * There's no "you guys" here. I saw the page tagged for deletion, thought it might be saved, worked on its citations for a while, then saw it thrown away some hours later.  I never heard of Poddar before yesterday, or Workmk either.  – Athaenara  ✉  16:50, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

@User:DBigXray I added G7 tag again because I think that a lot of work on the article is needed to give it a better shape. Further references from independent sources too are needed. I am working on it and will be back with article after few weeks. Thank You – Workmk ✉  15:41, 30January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.