Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hartek Power Private Ltd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Materialscientist (talk) 06:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Hartek Power Private Ltd

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Can only find one source among those listed that isn't a press release ; doesn't appear to have significant independent reliable sourcing to establish WP:CORP notability. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:35, 2 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - As above. People (who I can only assume are employed by this company) keep adding press-release style language to this article but there's still no credible claim of notability that would make this company worth including in an encyclopaedia. Exemplo347 (talk) 23:51, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:30, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:30, 3 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as corporate spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:31, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom; the article is clearly promotional and unencyclopaedic in addition to the notability issues Spiderone  10:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as typical promotional corporate spam. Aru@baska ❯❯❯  Vanguard 11:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. This partial rewrite does not address the above concerns either. Regards, HaeB (talk) 07:52, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * SNOW Delete as it's clear this is advertising part of an advertising campaign and WP:NOT applies by that alone, it's clear this is not hopeful for any meaningful improvements. SwisterTwister   talk  06:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.