Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hartslane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:46, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Hartslane

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Page reads like a puff piece and subject lacks significant notability Meatsgains (talk) 02:01, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:17, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:17, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:17, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * delete per nom - clearly promotional article with refs that don't evidence notability - David Gerard (talk) 17:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:PROMO as obvious corporate spam with language such as "...dedicated to delivering a cutting edge cultural programme..." and plethora of ext link in the body of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:43, 23 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.