Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvard–MIT Mathematics Tournament


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Seems to meet the criteria for Speedy keep as per #2 and/or #3. (non-admin closure)  Onel 5969  TT me 11:38, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Harvard–MIT Mathematics Tournament
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The page does not explain why this topic is notable, nor does it cite any sources. The references tag currently on the page was set up over a decade, and still isn't resolved. Winmaster123 (talk) 02:51, 11 February 2018 (UTC) — Winmaster123 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 11.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 03:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 04:57, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 04:57, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 04:57, 11 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep The article does explain why it's notable, "considered to be one of the most prestigious high school math competitions in the world". It's covered in sources such as What High Schools Don't Tell You and Academic Competitions for Gifted Students. Andrew D. (talk) 11:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's "rescue list", here. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 12:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Frivolous nomination by a suspicious new account. One might be forgiven for having April 2013 flashbacks. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 12:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Pinged here. Like everything Harvard-related it's probably got plenty of coverage, but I'm on mobile for much of today so I'm gonna toss this to for a cross-country perspective. EEng 12:25, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Presumably EEng meant User:David Eppstein. (Why hasn't User:David Epstein been UN-blocked, by the way? I guess back in 2007 the username creation filter didn't prevent names that were that similar to existing users...) Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 12:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep--Highly notable.It's a pathetic failure of WP:BEFORE. ~ Winged Blades Godric 13:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm adding stuff to it, preferably sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.226.26.132 (talk • contribs)
 * Keep Seems to have sufficient independent coverage to pass WP:EVENT.  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  18:51, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - surely, this must be a prank. The OP doesn't even exist. Atsme 📞📧 19:41, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per sources and reasoning above. Definitely passes WP:EVENT. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:34, 11 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.