Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvard Fencing Team


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep but cleanup.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)    14:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Harvard Fencing Team
Article is predominantly cruft, most of which is unjustifiable. Primary contributor is, who appears to be a member of the team, which is a possible violation of the vanity guidelines. Sending to AfD to see what others want to do. Isopropyl 23:56, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as winners of the the 2006 NCAA championship and having been around for 100+ years, I think they pass the notability bar. It does require a lot of clean up and more sourcing.  Love how the first 111 of 118 years is classified as the "Early Years"--Gay Cdn  (talk) (email) (Contr.) 01:18, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Yeah, it needs a lot of cleanup. I don't know how much of an article there will be after the nonsense is removed, but the highlights could probably be compiled along with the rest of Harvard athletics into a single sports page; see, for example, Michigan Wolverines. Isopropyl 02:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep "the first organized collegiate fencing team in the United States". Cleanup issues are not a matter for AfD. - CrazyRussian talk/email 04:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - Team is notable as NCAA champions. Quality is a seperate issue to be addressed elsewhere.  Badbilltucker 12:50, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.