Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harveer Gandam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Loughborough MCCU players. Consensus exists to apply WP:GNG instead of WP:NCRIC here. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 02:56, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Harveer Gandam

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable cricketer, fails WP:GNG. Störm  (talk)  18:01, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:07, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:07, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:07, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. EpicPupper 18:08, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. EpicPupper 18:08, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. EpicPupper 18:09, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Delete as I did find a teensy bit of media coverage of his sports performances, but otherwise the only other sources are data profiles cited in the article. None of this is WP:SIGCOV 👨x🐱 (talk) 18:17, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Loughborough MCCU players Only matches for uni sides. There is this but not enough for GNG. Redirect is a suitable WP:ATD and probably should have been BOLDly redirected to save the AfD. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:48, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. First class cricketer. If there are questions on notability, the AfD creator should perhaps read about it WP:CRIC and discuss there. Tintin 17:28, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * NCRIC offers only a weak presumption of notability (the suitability of the subject for a standalone article due to likely existence of coverage meeting GNG requirements). When challenged at AFD, it must be shown that that presumption was correct and that GNG has been met. It is not sufficient to simply restate that the SNG has been met, although even that is tenuous here since his participation is limited to non-competitive matches for a university side, not a first-class county, in an era when they were regarded by the counties as little more than practice games and an opportunity for padding averages. wjematherplease leave a message... 19:41, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kichu🐘 Need any help? 15:25, 28 April 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 19:33, 7 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.