Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvest (Neopagan magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was No consensus. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-27 07:19Z 

Harvest (Neopagan magazine)

 * — (View AfD)

non-notable publication Frater Xyzzy 16:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable as I can't find a lot about it, and no claims to notability in the article Jayden54 17:15, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - how about if we add more details on which writers published there, and which topics were covered in-depth? We can also cite references to it from other publications such as Green Egg, Whole Earth Review and Utne Reader. It's stubby now, but could be expanded.  Alternatively, it could be merged into an article about a variety of influential Neopagan zines in the 80s and 90s.  (note-I started this stub/article) --Kathryn NicDhàna ♫ ♦ ♫ 19:53, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Adler quotation establishes notability to my satisfaction.  I don't think even the most notable neopagan magazine would have many references in the mainstream media. JamesMLane t c 19:14, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Take this info with a grain of salt because it's personal Original research but I subscribed to quite a few neopagan zines during the time period of Harvest and was a reviewer for Factsheet Five so saw even more of them. Harvest was influential, stable, and well-known in the neopagan community of the time. Remember, this was before the internet and zines were often many people's sole link to the neopagan community. Personal Disclosure: I worked on Harvest as a volunteer and as a volunteer editor reviewing other Neopagan zines for the magazine for the last few years of publication, 1990-92. --Pigman (talk &bull; contribs) 19:38, 24 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.