Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvey & Clarke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Harvey & Clarke

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of in-depth coverage in reliable sources. The founders may be reliable (arguable), but, even so, that notability is not inherited by the company. Dweller (talk) 13:18, 22 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Lots of google docs and unknown websites mention about this firm. -- C E  (talk) 13:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi CE. If you've found reliable sources with in-depth coverage of the firm, please mention them here. I wouldn't want a notable firm to be deleted from Wikipedia. --Dweller (talk) 15:28, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:35, 30 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:56, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable sources are referenced.  One reference is to a historic biography that references the individuals and does not indicate that the firm is or was notable. The other reference is merely to an NPS page that does not discuss the firm.  Even if structures are referenced, the architect is not necessarily notable.--Rpclod (talk) 05:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.