Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvey Petito


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. per WP:G7.  So Why  11:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Harvey Petito

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Declined A7 speedy because the article contains a number of claims of appearing in multiple commercials for notable companies and having coverage in magazines.

Unfortunately, such coverage cannot be found. A single newspaper mentions him as an example with multiple other child models but that's it as far as I can tell. The TV and movie appearances were only as extras, nothing more. Most likely created by the subject or someone close to them but despite the likely COI the text is not spammy enough to justify G11 deletion, so I'm bringing it here. Regards  So Why  09:25, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  So  Why  09:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  So  Why  09:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  So  Why  09:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment If you visit the website that is linked in the article you will find all relevant photo's from the catalogues, TVC's etc. If you visit www.harveypetito.com and view the seperate tabs, each contains all of his body of work. In fact, if you follow the links within the wiki article they are all there too! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harveypetitofan (talk • contribs) 11:41, 24 May 2017 (UTC) — Harveypetitofan (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete blatant self-promotion littered with spamlinks, no independent third-party sources, absolutely no evidence that he meets our notability criteria Jimfbleak - talk to me?  11:57, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as a promotional article per WP:NOTSPAM. Claims of significance here do not reach the threshold of notability. TonyBallioni (talk) 12:42, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

comment - I can see where this is headed. Just delete the page. --Harveypetitofan (talk) 07:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Total misuse of EL's and absolute failure of WP:BLP. Ajf773 (talk) 12:46, 25 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.