Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Has globalisation been a benefit to everyone world wide


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Has globalisation been a benefit to everyone world wide

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Essay. No encyclopedic content. TheBilly (talk) 15:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete mostly Original research. RMHED (talk) 15:46, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per WP:NOT and WP:SOAP Doc Strange (talk) 15:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is an essay-style article (WP:NOT) and I don't see anyway to rewrite it to adhere our policies or style guide. Marasmusine (talk) 15:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or Userify under Wbena's page.. Sorry for recommending two courses of action, but I figgered maybe this Wbena person, the creator of this page, could just move it to a subpage or something. After actually creating a user page, that is....  Two One Six Five Five  discuss my greatness 16:16, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, user pages and user talk pages are only to be used for Wikipedia-related uses. You can write article drafts or essays on a subpage, but they have to relate to Wikipedia TheBilly (talk) 16:29, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. WP:OR, essay.  Malinaccier (talk) 16:24, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I think the fact that the article ends with a conclusion, answering the question in the title and written in the first-person, shows that our Neutral point of view and Wikipedia is not a soapbox policies apply. This just isn't a neutral encyclopaedia article, and there seems to be no scope for turning it into one. Effort would be far better spent improving globalization than trying to do something with this.  Delete. Uncle G (talk) 17:03, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Obvious WP:OR - --Pmedema (talk) 17:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. Matt Deres (talk) 19:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. Original research, nuke this per WP:OR. >< Richard  Ω6  12  20:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per WP:NOR. Mh29255 (talk) 01:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Snowball delete as failing several core policies to the extreme.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 04:11, 5 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.