Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hasibe Çerko


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 23:55, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Hasibe Çerko

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails notability, WP:AUTHOR Juggyevil (talk) 21:10, 1 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 01:08, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:10, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:10, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:10, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:10, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Juggyevil (talk) 21:10, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sources insufficient. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC).
 * Keep. I really don't think a WP:BEFORE was even attempted here, there isn't even an attempt to explain why the sources in the article are insufficient.
 * TEİS: this source, used in the article already, is a reliable source written by a scholar. It also cites two different critiques of Çerko's work.
 * This journal has an article about one of Çerko's books.
 * An offline article about the short story writing of Çerko.
 * Here is another article about her in a literary publication.
 * So yeah, the sources are more than sufficient. --GGT (talk) 22:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 23:26, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't speak the language, but the sources presented by GGT appear to be directly detailing the subject and her works. I'll have to AGF these sources meet independent RS, but the appearance and links appear to check out. Very difficult to find English sources on a subject only covered in Turkish. BusterD (talk) 21:09, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep As per the new sources that are revealed now. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 01:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.