Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hassan Abbas (legal scholar)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) -- ওহিদ (💬 &#124; 📝) 11:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Hassan Abbas (legal scholar)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

no indication of his notable; if it's, there is no independent reliable secondary sources for verification. Fails, significant coverage, WP:INDEPENDENT, WP:NACADEMIC, WP:BIO. As far as the sources are concerned, the writing of all of them is exactly the same (Obviously, this is not the main cause but still...); see 1, 2. Sources do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article standards for living person & academic prof. Three sources were provided from "asiasociety.org", that's primary and seft published; see 'Abbas Senior Advisor and Bernard Schwartz Fellow at Asia Society'. Creator (BEZH) of this article directly or indirectly attached to Abbas, see; they came here only to make this one, it's looks like spamming. -- ওহিদ (💬 &#124; 📝) 03:10, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. --  ওহিদ (💬 &#124; 📝) 03:10, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. --  ওহিদ (💬 &#124; 📝) 03:10, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. pass of WP:Prof. Nominator appears to have less than a month's editing experience. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:57, 22 December 2021 (UTC).
 * Ok, But, It doesn't matter what I'm experienced or not. Matter is that Abbas has no significant coverage at all. People are using his books as reliable sources, Which point do you think that this article 'pass of WP:Prof'? There is no point caught in my eyes any condition to meet the criteria of his significance (especially in WP:NPROF). Thanks -- ওহিদ (💬 &#124; 📝) 04:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Take a look at the scholar link four inches above. It is best to become acquainted with policy in the area before making nominations and carry out WP:Before. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:48, 22 December 2021 (UTC).


 * Keep. The NYT book review should have been a clue that this is a significant enough book author to pass WP:AUTHOR, but the nominated version had only two major-newspaper book reviews. I added more published reviews from academic journals, enough to make the case much more clear. Hint to nominator: the two reviews already listed were in fact in-depth independent reliable secondary sources about the subject's work, so the claim that those sources weren't present is false. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:32, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, Sir my name is Ohid. I'm from India. Can you look at Amira Sonbol's article what I'm creating now. Is it also notable? Thanks -- ওহিদ (💬 &#124; 📝) 08:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Three publications with triple-digit citations on Google Scholar, and roughly 26 reviews of her books listed on JSTOR: yes, doubly so. The reviews of her books could be listed in the article to forestall a discussion such as this one. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:42, 22 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: per copyright violence, see here. -- ওহিদ (💬 &#124; 📝) 07:35, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * No, it appears very clear that they copied from us rather than vice versa. Look at the history of our article and how that text came to be there. Look at the copyright date on the web page you list it as supposedly copied from. Additionally, I have struck out your comment because nominators are not allowed to !vote a second time (nor is anyone else). You can leave additional comments, but not with a boldfaced "keep" or "delete" unless you want to explicitly change your mind from some earlier opinion, in which case you should strike out the earlier one. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:47, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Sir, I'm really sorry, but this author creates controversy at Muhammad's children article. 'Ishan87' told me on my talk page about the editor named by 'Albertatiran' that's why I request to delete this article to help Ishan. Albertatiran quoted from the book by the name of The Prophet's Heir: The Life of Ali ibn Abi Talib, that Muhammad SAW adopted some of his children. Can you help them (Ishan87 & Albertatiran) on Muhammad's children? Thanks. --  ওহিদ (💬 &#124; 📝) 09:14, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. This appears to be totally inappropriate behavior for Wikipedia. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:32, 22 December 2021 (UTC).
 * See the times before commenting, I didn't doing any inappropriate behavior with David sir, instead of told him with respectfully. I've withdrawn this article after seeing he has secondary sources. Thank you! -- ওহিদ (💬 &#124; 📝) 10:39, 22 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.