Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hassan Esmaelzadeh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.--chaser (away) - talk 20:19, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Hassan Esmaelzadeh

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article contains no real claim to notability. Article has no sources, and when I looked, I couldn't find any. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 07:19, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I tagged the article for, and the response from (presumably) the author was to add a couple of references that appear to be self-published, and certainly not anything I'd call a reliable source. Can't see any prospect of establishing notability, looks like vanispamcruft. Delete. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 09:13, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing on Google scholar, fails WP:BIO, WP:CREATIVE. Could be even A7. Antipastor (talk) 15:57, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Only self-published sources found. Favonian (talk) 12:04, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a good article. He is a great philosopher. The article should not be deleted. — 77.104.120.226 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete - no evidence of notability in any reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:10, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Amateur hour at the philosophy club. Not notable as a philosopher or anything else (arguably not even a philosopher). Hairhorn (talk) 19:39, 19 October 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.