Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hassan Farsam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Listed for 14 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough participation to establish a consensus. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Hassan Farsam

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

CV page that fails WP:PROF. Farsam has published articles that can be examined on Google Scholar but I can find no evidence that he currently meets the criteria of WP:PROF. Being a faculty member and well published does not demonstrate significant impact in the field. Ash (talk) 10:20, 18 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:18, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  —--  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me,  My Contribs ) 14:40, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —--  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me,  My Contribs ) 14:40, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I have added a link to the Farsi wiki article which this was based on. I am not qualified to know if he is notable in his field, as I cannot read Farsi, and I'm guessing most references will be in Farsi rather than English. --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 14:40, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Weak keep. May pass WP:PROF #3 due to membership in the Iranian Academy of Medical Sciences. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:28, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I am not quite sure I always think it justified to accept such academies outside the major countries for academic science as intrinsically notablw--because of the principle that research notability is by  international standards.     DGG ( talk ) 03:15, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.